๐Ÿ’ฌ Join the ImageEval 2026 Slack for announcements & questions Join now โ†’
ImageEval 2026

Cultural Grounding in Arabic Multimodal Generation and Understanding

Task 2: CRAI-Bench is the first shared task targeting cultural accuracy in Arabic text-to-image generation. It evaluates whether AI-generated images faithfully represent Qatari and Arab cultural scenes using the Cultural Representation Accuracy Index (CRAI) โ€” a five-dimensional scoring framework validated against human annotation.

Overview

Given a reference image of an authentic Qatari cultural scene, an image caption, and an AI-generated image produced from that caption, participants develop systems that predict CRAI scores across five cultural accuracy dimensions. Systems are ranked by Spearman correlation against human-annotated gold scores.

The core challenge: our pilot study showed that GPT-4 as a judge achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.6250 against human annotators, with near-zero correlation on hallucination detection. Can you build a system that better aligns with human cultural judgment?

Cultural Accuracy Evaluation Qatari Culture LLM-as-a-Judge
Input Output
Reference image + caption + AI-generated image CRAI scores across 5 dimensions (0โ€“1)

Task Description

Given three elements per instance โ€” a reference image, a caption, and an AI-generated image produced from that caption โ€” participants predict CRAI scores across five dimensions.

Input

One row per instance in captions.tsv:

id              image_id    version    caption
img_001_v1      img_001     v1         Generate an image of a Qatari man wearing a white thobe...
img_001_v2      img_001     v2         A man wearing traditional Gulf attire...

Each instance also has two associated images: a reference image (ref/img_001.jpg) and a generated image (generated/img_001_v1.png).

Output

A TSV file with one row per instance:

id            CRAI_CEA  CRAI_CC  CRAI_CS  CRAI_CI  CRAI_HP  CRAI_composite
img_001_v1    0.90      0.85     0.75     0.88     0.05     0.82
img_001_v2    0.60      0.55     0.50     0.70     0.05     0.58

Evaluation

Metric Role What it measures
Spearman correlation official ranking correlation between predicted and gold CRAI_composite scores (higher is better)
MAE secondary / tiebreaker mean absolute error on CRAI_composite (lower is better)
Per-dimension Spearman diagnostic CEA, CC, CS, CI, HP reported separately on leaderboard

CRAI Framework

The Cultural Representation Accuracy Index (CRAI) scores images across five dimensions:

Dimension Code Weight Description
Cultural Element Accuracy CEA 0.30 Are expected cultural elements present and correctly depicted?
Contextual Coherence CC 0.20 Are elements placed in culturally appropriate settings?
Cultural Specificity CS 0.20 How specific is the depiction to the target culture?
Cultural Integrity CI 0.20 Is the representation truthful and free of distortion?
Hallucination Penalty HP โˆ’0.10 Are there fabricated cultural elements not in the caption?
CRAI_composite = 0.30 ร— CEA + 0.20 ร— CC + 0.20 ร— CS + 0.20 ร— CI โˆ’ 0.10 ร— HP

Cultural Specificity (CS) uses fixed tiers:

Score Meaning
1.00 Uniquely Qatari / target culture
0.75 Strongly associated with target culture
0.50 Regionally common across the Arab world
0.25 Generic Middle Eastern or vague
0.00 No cultural specificity

Score interpretation: โ‰ฅ 0.85 highly accurate ยท 0.70โ€“0.84 mostly accurate ยท 0.50โ€“0.69 moderate ยท 0.30โ€“0.49 weak ยท < 0.30 poor or misleading.

Dataset

The dataset consists of (reference image, caption, AI-generated image) triples grounded in Qatari culture. Each of 40 reference images has 5 caption versions varying in cultural specificity from fully Qatari-specific (v1) to entirely generic (v5).

Split Images Instances Gold Labels
train 24 120 yes
dev 8 40 yes
test 8 40 no (blind)

Cultural categories covered: people and traditional attire, architecture and built environment, objects.

TSV files and Images are available on Google Drive.

Baselines

The starter kit includes two ready-to-run baseline scripts.

System Spearman MAE Description
Mean baseline N/A 0.3450 Predicts training set mean for every instance โ€” floor to beat
GPT-4 via OpenRouter 0.6250 0.2248 LLM-as-a-judge with full CRAI rubric โ€” organizer baseline
# Run the GPT-4 baseline
python baselines/baseline_gpt4.py \
    --captions data/dev/captions.tsv \
    --ref_dir  data/dev/imgs/ref \
    --gen_dir  data/dev/imgs/generated \
    --output   predictions.tsv \
    --api_key  YOUR_OPENROUTER_KEY

# Evaluate locally
python evaluation/evaluate.py --gold data/dev/gold_human.tsv --pred predictions.tsv

Participation

You may use any model or pipeline. Approaches based on vision-language models, LLM-as-a-judge, multimodal embeddings, fine-tuned scorers, or novel combinations are all welcome.

Every participating team is expected to submit a short system description paper. See the submission guidelines.

Submission

  1. Produce predictions in the TSV format shown above.
  2. Validate with the format checker:
    python format_checker/check_format.py --pred predictions.tsv --split dev
    
  3. Evaluate locally with the scorer:
    python evaluation/evaluate.py --gold data/dev/gold_human.tsv --pred predictions.tsv
    
  4. Zip as predictions.zip and upload to the Codabench leaderboard:
    zip predictions.zip predictions.tsv
    
Phase Period Leaderboard
Development Phase until July 20, 2026 Codabench โ€” 16944

Submission limits: Development phase โ€” unlimited (10/day max). Test phase โ€” 5 total, 2/day. Best submission counts.

Questions

See the FAQ or email imageeval2026@gmail.com. The dataset is released for research use under CC BY-NC 4.0.