Task 2: CRAI-Bench is the first shared task targeting cultural accuracy in Arabic text-to-image generation. It evaluates whether AI-generated images faithfully represent Qatari and Arab cultural scenes using the Cultural Representation Accuracy Index (CRAI) โ a five-dimensional scoring framework validated against human annotation.
Overview
Given a reference image of an authentic Qatari cultural scene, an image caption, and an AI-generated image produced from that caption, participants develop systems that predict CRAI scores across five cultural accuracy dimensions. Systems are ranked by Spearman correlation against human-annotated gold scores.
The core challenge: our pilot study showed that GPT-4 as a judge achieves a Spearman correlation of 0.6250 against human annotators, with near-zero correlation on hallucination detection. Can you build a system that better aligns with human cultural judgment?
| Input | Output |
|---|---|
| Reference image + caption + AI-generated image | CRAI scores across 5 dimensions (0โ1) |
Task Description
Given three elements per instance โ a reference image, a caption, and an AI-generated image produced from that caption โ participants predict CRAI scores across five dimensions.
Input
One row per instance in captions.tsv:
id image_id version caption
img_001_v1 img_001 v1 Generate an image of a Qatari man wearing a white thobe...
img_001_v2 img_001 v2 A man wearing traditional Gulf attire...
Each instance also has two associated images: a reference image (ref/img_001.jpg) and a generated image (generated/img_001_v1.png).
Output
A TSV file with one row per instance:
id CRAI_CEA CRAI_CC CRAI_CS CRAI_CI CRAI_HP CRAI_composite
img_001_v1 0.90 0.85 0.75 0.88 0.05 0.82
img_001_v2 0.60 0.55 0.50 0.70 0.05 0.58
Evaluation
| Metric | Role | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Spearman correlation | official ranking | correlation between predicted and gold CRAI_composite scores (higher is better) |
| MAE | secondary / tiebreaker | mean absolute error on CRAI_composite (lower is better) |
| Per-dimension Spearman | diagnostic | CEA, CC, CS, CI, HP reported separately on leaderboard |
CRAI Framework
The Cultural Representation Accuracy Index (CRAI) scores images across five dimensions:
| Dimension | Code | Weight | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cultural Element Accuracy | CEA | 0.30 | Are expected cultural elements present and correctly depicted? |
| Contextual Coherence | CC | 0.20 | Are elements placed in culturally appropriate settings? |
| Cultural Specificity | CS | 0.20 | How specific is the depiction to the target culture? |
| Cultural Integrity | CI | 0.20 | Is the representation truthful and free of distortion? |
| Hallucination Penalty | HP | โ0.10 | Are there fabricated cultural elements not in the caption? |
CRAI_composite = 0.30 ร CEA + 0.20 ร CC + 0.20 ร CS + 0.20 ร CI โ 0.10 ร HP
Cultural Specificity (CS) uses fixed tiers:
| Score | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 1.00 | Uniquely Qatari / target culture |
| 0.75 | Strongly associated with target culture |
| 0.50 | Regionally common across the Arab world |
| 0.25 | Generic Middle Eastern or vague |
| 0.00 | No cultural specificity |
Score interpretation: โฅ 0.85 highly accurate ยท 0.70โ0.84 mostly accurate ยท 0.50โ0.69 moderate ยท 0.30โ0.49 weak ยท < 0.30 poor or misleading.
Dataset
The dataset consists of (reference image, caption, AI-generated image) triples grounded in Qatari culture. Each of 40 reference images has 5 caption versions varying in cultural specificity from fully Qatari-specific (v1) to entirely generic (v5).
| Split | Images | Instances | Gold Labels |
|---|---|---|---|
train |
24 | 120 | yes |
dev |
8 | 40 | yes |
test |
8 | 40 | no (blind) |
Cultural categories covered: people and traditional attire, architecture and built environment, objects.
TSV files and Images are available on Google Drive.
Baselines
The starter kit includes two ready-to-run baseline scripts.
| System | Spearman | MAE | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean baseline | N/A | 0.3450 | Predicts training set mean for every instance โ floor to beat |
| GPT-4 via OpenRouter | 0.6250 | 0.2248 | LLM-as-a-judge with full CRAI rubric โ organizer baseline |
# Run the GPT-4 baseline
python baselines/baseline_gpt4.py \
--captions data/dev/captions.tsv \
--ref_dir data/dev/imgs/ref \
--gen_dir data/dev/imgs/generated \
--output predictions.tsv \
--api_key YOUR_OPENROUTER_KEY
# Evaluate locally
python evaluation/evaluate.py --gold data/dev/gold_human.tsv --pred predictions.tsv
Participation
You may use any model or pipeline. Approaches based on vision-language models, LLM-as-a-judge, multimodal embeddings, fine-tuned scorers, or novel combinations are all welcome.
Every participating team is expected to submit a short system description paper. See the submission guidelines.
Submission
- Produce predictions in the TSV format shown above.
- Validate with the format checker:
python format_checker/check_format.py --pred predictions.tsv --split dev - Evaluate locally with the scorer:
python evaluation/evaluate.py --gold data/dev/gold_human.tsv --pred predictions.tsv - Zip as
predictions.zipand upload to the Codabench leaderboard:zip predictions.zip predictions.tsv
| Phase | Period | Leaderboard |
|---|---|---|
| Development Phase | until July 20, 2026 | Codabench โ 16944 |
Submission limits: Development phase โ unlimited (10/day max). Test phase โ 5 total, 2/day. Best submission counts.
Questions
See the FAQ or email imageeval2026@gmail.com. The dataset is released for research use under CC BY-NC 4.0.